Profile

{
  "prompt": "hey can you help me analyze my resume and tell me how I can improve it?",
  "target_roles": ["Strategy Consulting"],
  "depth": "standard",
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "master_resume.pdf",
      "mime": "application/pdf",
      "size": 184320,
      "signed_url": "https://storage.googleapis.com/quarktex-chat-attachments/<signed-get-url>"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "status": "ok",
  "deliverable_type": "resume_analysis_report",
  "title": "Master Resume Analysis — Strategy Consulting framing",
  "profile_snapshot": {
    "candidate_name": "Aarav Menon",
    "inferred_target_roles": ["Strategy Consulting", "General Management"],
    "stated_goal": "Analyze the master resume and find where it can be improved before tailoring for consulting roles.",
    "bullet_count": 28,
    "sections_detected": ["Education", "Work Experience", "Entrepreneurial / Social Impact", "Extracurriculars", "Awards"],
    "spike_read": "Social-impact work-ex is the clear spike — a recurring 'built from scratch + scaled' theme. Academics are solid but not yet framed as a spike (rank/percentile is buried).",
    "overall_assessment": "Strong raw material with a genuine work-ex spike, but the resume reads activity-first instead of impact-first and roughly a third of quantifiable bullets carry no number. Ownership verbs are inconsistent (several 'worked on' / 'helped' openings). The microfinance scale is impressive but under-monetised — you state member counts without the credit volume behind them. Tightening structure and pulling your real figures forward would move this from good to interview-grade."
  },
  "scorecard": {
    "bullet_structure": {"score": 6.5, "verdict": "Good, uneven", "comment": "Some bullets are crisp; others bury the lead or pack two achievements into one line."},
    "data_metrics": {"score": 5.0, "verdict": "Needs work", "comment": "~10 of 28 bullets are quantifiable but carry no number — the biggest single lever."},
    "keywords_context": {"score": 6.0, "verdict": "Improvable", "comment": "Several weak verbs and operations-flavoured phrasing dilute the consulting framing."},
    "overall": {"score": 6.0, "headline": "A real spike held back by activity-first phrasing and missing numbers — high upside with targeted fixes."}
  },
  "bullet_feedback": [
    {
      "id": "B1",
      "section": "Work Experience — Saath Microfinance",
      "original": "Worked with 14-50 SHG members to improve loan repayment and financial literacy.",
      "verdict": "red_flag",
      "structure": {"assessment": "Activity-first and vague — leads with 'worked with', no outcome.", "action": "keep", "detail": "Re-open with impact + ownership; keep as one line."},
      "data": {"has_data": false, "flag": "red", "assessment": "Quantifiable but unmonetised. Member count is a range, and the credit value + repayment delta are missing.", "suggested_metrics": ["credit / ₹ mobilised", "repayment rate before vs after (%)", "exact # of SHGs / members"]},
      "keywords": {"alignment": "Reads as social-work delivery, not consulting impact.", "weak_verbs": ["Worked with"], "stronger_verbs": ["Mobilised", "Drove", "Built"], "reframe": "Lead with the financial outcome you drove across the groups."},
      "suggested_rewrite": "Mobilised ₹[insert amount] in credit across [insert #] self-help groups ([insert # members]), lifting on-time repayment from [insert %] to [insert %] via a financial-literacy program you designed.",
      "integrity_note": "Plug in your real ₹ figure and repayment numbers — pull them from your branch MIS; don't estimate up."
    },
    {
      "id": "B2",
      "section": "Work Experience — Saath Microfinance",
      "original": "Mobilized INR 5.5 Cr to standardize a multi-branch credit chain and managed reporting for 1,000+ accounts.",
      "verdict": "split",
      "structure": {"assessment": "Two distinct achievements (₹5.5 Cr mobilisation AND a 1,000-account reporting system) crammed into one line — each can stand alone.", "action": "split", "detail": "Split into a 'mobilisation/standardisation' bullet and a 'reporting/ops' bullet to raise your usable point count."},
      "data": {"has_data": true, "flag": "amber", "assessment": "Strong ₹ figure, but no efficiency/growth delta on the reporting work and no comparison year.", "suggested_metrics": ["YoY growth in disbursal", "turnaround-time reduction on reporting", "error / NPA reduction %"]},
      "keywords": {"alignment": "Good — 'standardize', 'multi-branch' read well for consulting.", "weak_verbs": ["managed"], "stronger_verbs": ["Streamlined", "Re-engineered"], "reframe": "Swap 'managed reporting' for an outcome verb on the reporting system."},
      "suggested_rewrite": "A) Mobilised ₹5.5 Cr to standardise a multi-branch credit chain, [insert YoY %] growth in disbursals. B) Re-engineered reporting for 1,000+ accounts, cutting reconciliation turnaround by [insert %] / [insert days→hours].",
      "integrity_note": "Only split if both halves are genuinely yours — keep the ₹5.5 Cr where you can defend it."
    },
    {
      "id": "B3",
      "section": "Work Experience — Saath Microfinance",
      "original": "Helped the regional head prepare presentations for the quarterly review.",
      "verdict": "rephrase",
      "structure": {"assessment": "Low-impact support bullet; consider combining with another stakeholder-facing line or cutting if space is tight on the tailored copy.", "action": "combine", "detail": "Could fold into a leadership/communication bullet if you presented any of it yourself."},
      "data": {"has_data": false, "flag": "amber", "assessment": "Hard to quantify, but you can add the audience seniority / decision it informed.", "suggested_metrics": ["audience (e.g. presented to [N] regional heads)", "decision / outcome it drove"]},
      "keywords": {"alignment": "'Helped...prepare' signals bystander, not driver.", "weak_verbs": ["Helped", "prepare"], "stronger_verbs": ["Built", "Synthesised", "Presented"], "reframe": "Claim the analysis you actually owned."},
      "suggested_rewrite": "Built the quarterly-review analysis for the regional head covering [insert region/portfolio], surfacing [insert insight] that informed [insert decision].",
      "integrity_note": "If you only formatted slides, don't claim the analysis — reframe truthfully toward whatever you genuinely owned."
    },
    {
      "id": "B4",
      "section": "Entrepreneurial / Social Impact — Campus Venture",
      "original": "Launched a first-of-its-kind travel-day enterprise for the district.",
      "verdict": "needs_data",
      "structure": {"assessment": "Good impact-first opener, but it stops at the launch — no scale or result.", "action": "keep", "detail": "Append scale + outcome to complete the formula."},
      "data": {"has_data": false, "flag": "red", "assessment": "Launch with zero quantification reads as a claim, not a result.", "suggested_metrics": ["customers / participants served", "revenue generated", "# of trips / partners onboarded"]},
      "keywords": {"alignment": "'first-of-its-kind' is strong; keep it.", "weak_verbs": [], "stronger_verbs": ["Launched", "Pioneered"], "reframe": "Pair the pioneering frame with proof it worked."},
      "suggested_rewrite": "Pioneered the district's first travel-day enterprise, serving [insert #] customers and generating ₹[insert revenue] across [insert # months].",
      "integrity_note": "Find your real participant + revenue numbers from your records before sending — placeholder stays until then."
    }
  ],
  "structure_moves": {
    "combine": [
      {"bullets": ["B3", "B7"], "rationale": "Both are stakeholder-communication support tasks; merged they make one credible 'communicated to senior leadership' bullet instead of two weak ones.", "merged_example": "Synthesised portfolio analyses for the regional head and [insert forum], informing [insert decision] across [insert region]."}
    ],
    "split": [
      {"bullet": "B2", "into": ["Mobilised ₹5.5 Cr to standardise a multi-branch credit chain ([insert YoY %] disbursal growth).", "Re-engineered reporting for 1,000+ accounts, cutting reconciliation turnaround by [insert %]."], "rationale": "Two distinct, individually-strong achievements — splitting raises your master's usable point count and isolates a 'scale' win from an 'efficiency' win."}
    ]
  },
  "data_red_flags": [
    "B1 — quantifiable but no number; add ₹ credit mobilised + repayment delta + exact member count.",
    "B4 — launch with no scale/result; add customers served + revenue.",
    "Education — your rank/percentile exists but isn't surfaced; add it to convert academics into a second spike."
  ],
  "keyword_recommendations": {
    "target_framing": "Consulting impact (problem -> action -> quantified result), not operations/social-work task language.",
    "add_keywords": ["stakeholder management", "process standardisation", "go-to-market", "portfolio growth", "cross-functional"],
    "strong_action_verbs": ["Mobilised", "Spearheaded", "Re-engineered", "Streamlined", "Diagnosed", "Negotiated", "Scaled"],
    "avoid_words": ["worked on", "helped", "assisted", "managed (when you led)", "responsible for", "prepared"],
    "comparative_data_ideas": [
      "Show disbursal / repayment this year vs last to evidence a growth trend.",
      "Frame the literacy program's repayment lift as before -> after."
    ]
  },
  "priority_actions": [
    "Fix the 3 red-flag bullets first (B1, B4, Education spike) — quantifying these moves the data score the most.",
    "Re-open every 'worked on / helped' bullet with an ownership verb + impact.",
    "Split B2 into a scale bullet and an efficiency bullet to add a usable point.",
    "Surface your academic rank/percentile to build a second spike alongside work-ex.",
    "Sweep all bullets for the action/scale/impact formula; add scale where revenue isn't available."
  ],
  "master_resume_integrity_note": "Every suggestion here is a reframing of what's already on your resume or a prompt to add your OWN verified data (shown as [bracketed placeholders]). Nothing invents an achievement or a number — so when you pull these points into your up-to-10 tailored final resumes, they stay ISB-compliant and you can defend each line in an interview.",
  "encouragement": "Your microfinance spike is genuinely strong — once the numbers behind it are on the page, this resume will punch well above its current read.",
  "confidence": "high",
  "notes": "Analysed at 'standard' depth — covered the highest-leverage bullets and every red-flag; a few low-impact extracurricular lines weren't individually itemised. Re-run at depth='thorough' for a line-by-line pass of all 28 bullets."
}